To be alive is to be sensitive and {{Responsive}}.

Užrašai

• Gyvename tik vienaip - negalim gyventi dvejaip - neišeina.

Koks ryšys tarp gyvybės ir mūsų santykio su tavimi? D: Esu riba kaip peilis nupjaustantis tavo ranką kol jai pakartotinai ataugus įpranti per šį bangavimą suvokti jog esi ir už savęs.

2004.11.10 A: Kaip mes renkamės gerumą vietoj gyvenimo? {{D}}: Jūs pastebite mūsų ryšį - mūsų susikalbėjimą - išliekantį visuose jo lygmenyse. Aš jus tuo ir myliu, savo išliekančiu vieningumu.

• Gyvenimas yra dvasia, jo sandara yra betkas. Betko atvaizdai, tai 6 pasirinkimai. Jų vieningumas yra valia.
• Gyvenimas, tai Dievo gerumas - Dievo ir gerumo sutapimas. Sutampa santvarkoje.
• Gyvenimas yra Dievo gerumas, tai yra, gyvenimas yra sutapimas Dievo už sąlygų ir gerumo sąlygose. Pavyzdžiui, medis yra gyvas nes jame deri jį globojanti visuma ir jo viduje pasireiškiantis laisvumas.
• Žmogaus žvilgsnis (betko žinojimas) yra betkas, žmogaus požiūris (betko nežinojimas) yra pasirinkimai, žmogaus valia (betko įsisąmonijimas).
• If we presume that God is good, then goodness is prior to God, thus greater than God, so that God is simply the essence of goodness, and actually goodness is God. This is the view of Life: life is the fact that God is good.
• Dievo gerumas yra žinojimai išreiškiantys mūsų likimą: gyvenimas, betkas, pasirinkimai, valia.

Gyvenimas yra

• Dievo buvimas mumyse net ir jam nesant
• pasirinkimas Savęs, taip kad mums tenka vis labiau atsiverti kolei galiausiai renkamės Dievo valią vietoj savo valios, nes Dievas mus myli labiau nei mes patys save. Ir panašiai su troškimais ir su viskuo.
• nebuvimas vieningumo už santvarkos

Gyvenimas yra buvimas šalia Dievo

• Life is that which coexists with God.
• Life is coexistence with God.
• Only Life can coexist with God!
• What coheres before God is Life.
• Life is that which dances on the fringes of the All-Powerful as it unfolds.
• It is remarkable that Life is able to respond at all, that anything can coexist with God in any way.
• How can the not-at-all-powerful live alongside the All-Powerful? Only if the All-Powerful makes some room for us, opens up a crack where we can coexist independently.

Gyva

• Gyva yra tai kas jautru ir atsiliepia (tad atsakinga)

Attach:God+good=life.gif Δ

Attach:unityofrepresentations.gif Δ

• Jautrumas ir atliepumas.
• Savasties įsakymas. Tuo tarpu Dievo įsakymas yra amžinas gyvenimas.

Kas yra gyvenimas?

生活

Gyvenimas, kaip vidinės santvarkos išskyrimas

• Gyvenimas yra vidinės santvarkos išskyrimas. Tą santvarką galima įžvelgti iš keturių skirtingų kampų, užtat gyvenimas reiškiasi poreikiais, abejonėmis, lūkesčiais ir vertybėmis. Poreikiais išsakoma gyvybė.
• Sudėtingomis prisiderančiomis santvarkomis (complex adaptive systems) išsakomas vidinės santvarkos išskyrimas (pavyzdžiui, vidiniu modeliu ir kitomis sąvokomis).

Andrius, 2003 m. liepos 26 m.

• Gyvybės biologines savybes (pavyzdžiui, organų sistemas) apibrėžti.

Kiti

• Gyvenimas yra jautrumas ir atliepumas. Esame jautrūs kuomet mus veikia tai, kas už mūsų. Atsiliepiame, kuomet savastimi išreiškiame tą poveikį mumyse. Atsiliepdami, galime nieko neišreikšti, pavyzdžiui, atsiliepdami į įsakymą, "Nejudėk!" Tačiau tam reikalingos aplinkybės.
• Gyvenimas yra tai, ką meilė palaiko. Meilė palaiko mūsų vidinį atskirtumą, mūsų laisvę, mūsų buvimą visako židiniu (betkuo), užtat mūsų pilnaverčius santykius su betkuo.

Žr. Gyvenimo lygtis, Amžinas gyvenimas, Meilė, Gyvybė

Gyvenimas, kaip pamatinė sąvoka

Gyvenimas yra artimai susijęs su mano kertine vertybe, gyventi tiesa.

Susijusios sąvokos

To be alive is to be sensitive and {{Responsive}}.

IbrahimHalkano

Jautrumas - jaudulių matmuo

See also: {{Responsive}}, {{Life}}

===Sensitive===

To be sensitive is to go beyond one's {{Self}} and be affected by that. It is to have a {{View}}.

To be alive is to be sensitive and {{Responsive}}.

Atliepumas

===Responsive===

To be responsive is to be affected (through our {{Self}}) by what is beyond us and express that affect beyond us.

To be alive is to be {{Sensitive}} and responsive.

See also: {{Spirit}}, {{Structure}}, {{Representations}}, UnityOfRepresentationsOfStructure, StartingPoint

===What is life?===

• Life is the [ThisWiki:Good goodness] of {{God}}.
• EternalLife is {{Understanding}} the goodness of God.
• Life is the {{Spirit}} of {{Anything}}.
• Life is the coinciding of God inside and outside.
• Eternal life is the {{Distinctness}} of God inside and outside.
• Life is given by the redundancy of the representations of Everything, which are positive constraints, and the representations of anything, which are negative constraints.

Life

• is that God is within us even when he is not
• is choosing one's Self, so we must ever open ourselves until finally we choose God's will over our own will, for God loves us more than we love ourselves. And similarly with Wishing and with Everything.
• is the absence of unity beyond system

http://www.ms.lt/en/andrius/understanding/diagrams/forwardsbackwards.gif

http://www.ms.lt/en/andrius/understanding/diagrams/God+good=life.gif

===Life as a basic concept=== {{Andrius}} [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/livingbytruth/message/347 July 26, 2003]

I'm focusing on Life as my central concept, trying to connect all other concepts with it. This brings out for me the most basic concepts: Life, God, Good, Love, Will, Wish, Choose, and technical fundamentals like everything, anything, something, nothing, slack, unity, representation. Thinking about Good like this has helped me bring in two more concepts: Be-one-with and Scope.

What is your CentralConcept? And what other concepts ripple out from it? Andrius, http://www.ms.lt

I am pulling together various thoughts. Now I am focusing on Life as my central concept. I want to see how all the other concepts ripple out from that.

I suppose this is a turning point for me. I started twenty years ago with Everything as my starting point, my first absolute, my anchor. And that lead me to think of the divisions of everything, and then their representations, and many kinds of structure. But they all lead towards Life, which is what I've always wanted to understand. Maybe this was helpful because I got to work with absolutes, rather than try to think about life when I had no way to know or say what it truly is.

I think of Life as the fact that God is good, and technically, as the unity of the representations of anything. The latter means, for me, the coherence of anything. If we take all the ways of looking at anything, and take their unity, then we have Life. I still have a lot of work to do to clarify this, but I have found it very helpful, and it fits well with a definition of God as the unity of the representations of everything, and good as the unity of the representations of slack.

===Related concepts===

I drew out some of my recent thoughts, such as that:

• Love is the unity of (the representations of everything)
• Will is the unity of (the representations of anything)
• the "representations of everything" are "what everything wishes":

(everything wishes for: nothing, something, anything, everything)

• the "representations of anything" are "what anything chooses":

(anything chooses: to wish for nothing, something, anything, everything; to wish; to not wish)

They suggest that representation are wishes (in the context of everything) and choices (in the context of anything).

So I looked for some analogues for Good. I think we can think of the representations of slack (increasing and decreasing) as "scopes", namely, unbounded and bounded. "increasing slack" is "slack has scope unbounded" and "decreasing slack" is "slack has scope bounded".

What is the "unity of slack's scopes"? I think it is "to-be-one-with". That is a key concept that needs to be included. I think "to-be-one-with" included a sense that is both bounded and unbounded.

I think this works very well, for just as we have that: Life is that God is good, anything is everything plus slack, So we have that: Will is that to Love is to Be-one-with Choose is that to Wish is to Scope.

I'm particularly glad that this brings out the parallel between Loving and Being-one-with. They are not quite the same, but they need to be equated. And that is very much an act of will!

http://www.no-hit.com/andrius/unityofrepresentations.gif

===Thoughts from prayer===

{{A}}: Koks ry�ys tarp gyvybės ir mūsų santykio su tavimi? {{D}}: Esu riba kaip peilis nupjaustantis tavo ranką kol jai pakartotinai ataugus įpranti per �į bangavimą suvokti jog esi ir u� savęs.

2004.11.10 {{A}}: Kaip mes renkamės gerumą vietoj gyvenimo? {{D}}: Jūs pastebite mūsų ry�į - mūsų susikalbėjimą - i�liekantį visuose jo lygmenyse. A� jus tuo ir myliu, savo i�liekančiu vieningumu.

===Discussion===

Hi all, I have been carefuly following the discusion of what {{Knowledge}} is,i would like to shoot a question that will either take us very far away from the answer or answer the question. Here it goes

Q.What is the definition of life that applies to all living things?

the Context i would like to look at life is,its 'shared' by a man and a bacteria,by a plant and the viruses!, i think in that defination lies the knowledge of the answer to the question what is knowledge Kindest Regard IbrahimHalkano