• padalinimų poslinkius-ašis

• pertvarkymus, jų poveikius ir tikslus

Brėžinyje bandžiau sulyginti

• savo ir kitų veiksmus, mintis, nuostatas
• širdies logiką ir pasaulio logiką
• Jėzaus logiką

• ženklų savybes
• telkėjus ir jų tikslus
• pertvarkymus ir jų tikslus
• savo ir kitų nuostatas, veiksmus, mintis

• Aggregation - žemėlapynas

• Building blocks - lentelė

Telkėjai (organizing objects)

[+Gyvybės savybės - telkian

• The mind requires the making of a choice within each dimension opened up by an organizing object.

Brėžinyje sulyginau

• padalinimus
• ženklų savybes

Organizing object

• Each organizing object describes a structural way in which we stay free, a dimension which we share with our neighbor, and to which we respond in the same way, but within which we are free to differ from them.
• Living systems require the freedom for selection within each dimension opened up by an organizing object.
• The mind requires the making of a choice within each dimension opened up by an organizing object.

• Building blocks - žemėlapynas

• Internal models - metraštis

Savybės, Gyvybė, Pertvarkymai, Gyvybės dėsniai

Gyvybės savybės aprašytos David Holland knygoje Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity.

Jas sulyginčiau su pertvarkymais:

• Diversity - raida
• - žemėlapynas
• Building blocks
• Nonlinearity - vadovėlis
• - metraštis
• Tags - žinynas
• Flows - kelionė

Savybės, Gyvybė, Gyvybės dėsniai

The mind requires the making of a choice within each dimension opened up by an organizing object.

Living systems require the freedom for selection within each dimension opened up by an organizing object.

Taken from a book on complex systems by David Holland.

Žr. Savybės

Each organizing object describes a structural way in which we stay free, a dimension which we share with our neighbor, and to which we respond in the same way, but within which we are free to differ from them.

See also: PrinciplesOfLife, {{Topologies}}, {{Anything}}, {{Everything}}, EverythingVAnything, FifteenPropertiesOfLife

{{Andrius}} [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/livingbytruth/message/363 September 4, 2003]

I went through Christopher Alexander's "The Nature of Order" and his fifteen principles of life.

I will describe them as the features by which "anything" may connect itself with "everything" as centers of life, limited and unlimited.

We can think of "everything" and "anything" as players that wish to link up with each other.

"Anything" plays through a trinity of roles: taking a stand, following through, and reflecting. This cycle is the motor of our life.

"Everything" plays by going beyond itself. It is the infinite recursiveness of Why? It is the same recursiveness in the cycle of our soul - taking a stand, following through, reflecting - which is how we are conscious of everything.

Three of Alexander's properties of life describe this relationship just as it is.

"take a stand" is in "strong centers" (made of other strong centers) "follow through" is in "strong boundaries" (same order of magnitude as centers. itself made up of boundaries) "reflect" is in "levels of scale" (recursive nesting. regular size jumps between scales)

Where is everything? Here it is in the recursive nature, going ever deeper, inward, but also, going back outward, farther than we may imagine.

We are limited, hence unable to conceive directly our connection, but may only allude to it. Our conception is thus given not by this infinite recursion, but through representations of everything. Everything is represented in four ways, as true, direct, constant, significant. Moreover, in its relationship with anything, it is given as a player of a mind game which generates properties of life, of the oneness of the spirit beyond and within structure, of everything and anything.

"Significant" generates a mind game, where significant is that which is unencompassable, can't be captured: If thinking is significant, then so is being, for thoughts are encompassed by the thinker. If being is significant, then so is doing, for things are encompassed by the actions that manifest them. If doing is significant, then so is thinking, for actions are encompassed by the observations made of them.

where is the everything? everything is identified with the relaxation of global centers to allow for restatement through local centers.

"be" is in "not-separateness" (not apart from the world, lack of separation from other centers, blending into them, supporting them, fragmented boundary) "do" is in "gradients" (slow variation of larger center makes for gradient given by new centers) "think" is in "roughness" (relaxation of global constraints so local constraints can have priority)

"Constant" generates a mind game: In searching for constancy, we find one example of constancy, otherwise it is constantly unconstant. So the constancy is in the "one" or in the "all". Note that to do this search, what we select needs to be the same as what we judge, they are multiply constant, "many".

where is the everything? everything is identified with that which searches for centers, perhaps finding one (and breaking symmetry) or not finding one (and leaving symmetry) but especially in the regularity of the "many", which blankets the entire space with centers.

"one" is in the "good shape" (as a shape, made of multiple coherent centers, built from simple elemental structures, clear building blocks with distinct symmetries. regularity allows for cross- relationships, clear division of function, etc.) "all" is in the "local symmetries" (default solution is symmetry, a pre-filling of space) "many" is in the "positive space" (every part is whole onto itself, not leftover, has a strong center. all space useful, evenhanded complements, no wasted space.)

"Direct" generates a mind game: Our attention can be directed by something other than itself, an "object". Subsequently, it can be directed by itself, this is "process". Finally, it may or may not be directed, this is "subject".

where is the everything? everything is identified with that which gives attention to centers, and especially, the subject, the ambiguity and interlock.

"object" is in the "contrast" (creation of differentiation, acknowledgement of purposeful, meaningful centers) "process" is in the "echoes" (repetition of motif at different levels, same angles as building blocks, same process involved) "subject" is in the "deep interlock and ambiguity" (center and its complement enmeshed by shared and ambiguous subcenters)

"True" generates a mind game, where true is what can't be hidden, is obvious:

The content and what reveals it may be the same, in which case it is "necessarily" true. Otherwise, the content may be different from what reveals it, and follows it, so is "actually" true. Finally, what may be true is the relationship between the content and what reveals it, which is "possibly" true.

where is the everything? everything is identified with that which serves as the center, and especially the void, what is possible.

"necessary" is in the "simplicity and inner calm" (unnecessary is taken away, freely focused on function. slow) "actual" is in the "alternating repetition" (intensified by counterpoint of systems. continually engages the eye, recurring action, space repeats, oscillation) "possible" is in the "void" (solid contrast to the clutter that surrounds it, connects with infinite void, brings life to mass of small centers)

Each organizing object describes a structural way in which we stay free, a dimension which we share with our neighbor, and to which we respond in the same way, but within which we are free to differ from them.