Mintys.ParaiškosApieTrisProtus istorija
Paslėpti nežymius pakeitimus - Rodyti galutinio teksto pakeitimus
2024 rugsėjo 13 d., 17:16
atliko -
Ištrintos 7-29 eilutės:
--------------------
'''Modeling three kinds of inference - enactive, predictive, cybernetic - with super division algebras and Bott periodicity'''
Active Inference textbook notes how this theoretical framework reconciles conflicting theories of sentience - enactive, predictive, cybernetic.
* Open problem: "By connecting different perspectives, Active Inference can potentially help us understand how they illuminate one another."
* How does it reconcile them?
** Active Inference inherits from a free energy principle that equates existence with self-evidencing and self-evidencing with an enactive sort of inference.
** Imagine a simple creature that must solve problems like finding food or shelter. When cast as Active Inference, the creature’s problems can be described in enactive terms, as acting to solicit preferred sensations (e.g., food-related sensations). To the extent that these preferred sensations are included (as prior beliefs) in its generative model, the organism is effectively gathering evidence for its model—or, more allegorically, for its existence (i.e., maximizing model evidence or self-evidencing). This simple principle has ramifications for psychological functions traditionally considered in isolation, such as perception, action control, memory, attention, intention, emotion, and more. For example, perception and action are both self-evidencing, in the sense that a creature can align what it expects, given its generative model, with what it senses e ither by changing its beliefs (about the presence of food) or by changing the world (soliciting food-related sensations).
*** Here the third mind chooses whether to update beliefs (implementing the second mind) or to update the world (implementing the first mind).
Will present a model that does reconcile these conflicting theories. The three minds.
* Modeling the third mind - cybernetic mind - as choosing among the other two minds.
Will show how to mathematically model that with super division algebras and Bott periodicity.
Will relate that to active inference.
Note
* Analyze other talks on applied Active Inference.
2024 rugsėjo 12 d., 22:12
atliko -
Pridėta 22 eilutė:
* Modeling the third mind - cybernetic mind - as choosing among the other two minds.
2024 rugsėjo 12 d., 22:11
atliko -
Pakeistos 16-18 eilutės iš
** Active Inference inherits from a f ree energy principle that equates existence with self-evidencing and self-evidencing with an enactive sort of inference.
į:
** Active Inference inherits from a free energy principle that equates existence with self-evidencing and self-evidencing with an enactive sort of inference.
** Imagine a simple creature that must solve problems like finding food or shelter. When cast as Active Inference, the creature’s problems can be described in enactive terms, as acting to solicit preferred sensations (e.g., food-related sensations). To the extent that these preferred sensations are included (as prior beliefs) in its generative model, the organism is effectively gathering evidence for its model—or, more allegorically, for its existence (i.e., maximizing model evidence or self-evidencing). This simple principle has ramifications for psychological functions traditionally considered in isolation, such as perception, action control, memory, attention, intention, emotion, and more. For example, perception and action are both self-evidencing, in the sense that a creature can align what it expects, given its generative model, with what it senses e ither by changing its beliefs (about the presence of food) or by changing the world (soliciting food-related sensations).
*** Here the third mind chooses whether to update beliefs (implementing the second mind) or to update the world (implementing the first mind).
** Imagine a simple creature that must solve problems like finding food or shelter. When cast as Active Inference, the creature’s problems can be described in enactive terms, as acting to solicit preferred sensations (e.g., food-related sensations). To the extent that these preferred sensations are included (as prior beliefs) in its generative model, the organism is effectively gathering evidence for its model—or, more allegorically, for its existence (i.e., maximizing model evidence or self-evidencing). This simple principle has ramifications for psychological functions traditionally considered in isolation, such as perception, action control, memory, attention, intention, emotion, and more. For example, perception and action are both self-evidencing, in the sense that a creature can align what it expects, given its generative model, with what it senses e ither by changing its beliefs (about the presence of food) or by changing the world (soliciting food-related sensations).
*** Here the third mind chooses whether to update beliefs (implementing the second mind) or to update the world (implementing the first mind).
2024 rugsėjo 12 d., 22:07
atliko -
Pakeistos 15-19 eilutės iš
Will show how to mathematically model
į:
* How does it reconcile them?
** Active Inference inherits from a f ree energy principle that equates existence with self-evidencing and self-evidencing with an enactive sort of inference.
Will present a model that does reconcile these conflicting theories. The three minds.
Will show how to mathematically model that with super division algebras and Bott periodicity.
** Active Inference inherits from a f ree energy principle that equates existence with self-evidencing and self-evidencing with an enactive sort of inference.
Will present a model that does reconcile these conflicting theories. The three minds.
Will show how to mathematically model that with super division algebras and Bott periodicity.
Ištrintos 23-29 eilutės:
How does it reconcile them?
* Active Inference inherits from a f ree energy principle that equates existence with self-evidencing and self-evidencing with an enactive sort of inference.
Relate them to three minds.
Model them with super division algebras and Bott periodicity.
2024 rugsėjo 12 d., 22:06
atliko -
Pridėtos 14-20 eilutės:
* Open problem: "By connecting different perspectives, Active Inference can potentially help us understand how they illuminate one another."
Will present a model that does reconcile these conflicting theories.
Will show how to mathematically model that.
Will relate that to active inference.
Will present a model that does reconcile these conflicting theories.
Will show how to mathematically model that.
Will relate that to active inference.
2024 rugsėjo 12 d., 22:04
atliko -
Pridėta 16 eilutė:
* Active Inference inherits from a f ree energy principle that equates existence with self-evidencing and self-evidencing with an enactive sort of inference.
2024 rugsėjo 12 d., 22:02
atliko -
Pakeistos 11-22 eilutės iš
'''Mathematically modeling enactive answers, predictive questions and cybernetic investigations with super division algebras and Bott periodicity'''
į:
'''Modeling three kinds of inference - enactive, predictive, cybernetic - with super division algebras and Bott periodicity'''
Active Inference textbook notes how this theoretical framework reconciles conflicting theories of sentience - enactive, predictive, cybernetic.
How does it reconcile them?
Relate them to three minds.
Model them with super division algebras and Bott periodicity.
Note
* Analyze other talks on applied Active Inference.
Active Inference textbook notes how this theoretical framework reconciles conflicting theories of sentience - enactive, predictive, cybernetic.
How does it reconcile them?
Relate them to three minds.
Model them with super division algebras and Bott periodicity.
Note
* Analyze other talks on applied Active Inference.
2024 rugsėjo 11 d., 19:27
atliko -
Pridėtos 10-14 eilutės:
'''Mathematically modeling enactive answers, predictive questions and cybernetic investigations with super division algebras and Bott periodicity'''
----------------------------------------
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 14:45
atliko -
Pakeista 6 eilutė iš:
* [[https://www.lkti.lt/uploads/Konferencijos/2024/2024.11.07-08/2024.11.07-08.cfp.NEW.pdf | Human Condition in the Anthropocence]] Siūlyti iki rugsėjo 10 d.
į:
* [[https://www.lkti.lt/uploads/Konferencijos/2024/2024.11.07-08/2024.11.07-08.cfp.NEW.pdf | Human Condition in the Anthropocene]] Siūlyti iki rugsėjo 10 d.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 14:21
atliko -
Pakeista 19 eilutė iš:
Intellectual history juxtaposes yin and yang, intuition and rationality, fast-thinking System 1 and slow-thinking System 2. Various thinkers include the third faculty of self-knowing wisdom: Plato (epithumetikon, thumetikon, logistikon), Aristotle (rhetoric, logic, dialectic), Confucius (duty, laws, virtue), Xun Kuang (wandering, focused, empty minds), St.Paul (carnal, soulish, spiritual people), Spinoza (experience, reason, intuition), Montesquieu (judicial, executive, legislative powers), Kant (judgment, practical reason, pure reason), Peirce (oneness, twoness, threeness), Arendt (labor, work, action). Beauty, goodness and truth entice these minds, respectively.
į:
Intellectual history juxtaposes yin and yang, intuition and rationality, fast-thinking System 1 and slow-thinking System 2. Various thinkers include the third faculty of self-knowing wisdom: Plato (epithumetikon, thumetikon, logistikon), Aristotle (rhetoric, logic, dialectic), Confucius (duty, laws, virtue), Xun Kuang (wandering, focused, empty minds), St.Paul (carnal, soulish, spiritual people), Spinoza (experience, reason, intuition), Montesquieu (judicial, executive, legislative powers), Kant (judgment, practical reason, pure reason), Peirce (oneness, twoness, threeness), Arendt (labor, work, action). Beauty, goodness and truth enchant these minds, respectively.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 14:20
atliko -
Pakeista 15 eilutė iš:
Metaphysically, we introspect a mind that unconsciously knows answers, a mind that consciously does not know, thus questions, and a mind (consciousness) which investigates, relating questions and answers, matching what we know and what we do not know, choosing to act consciously or unconsciously.
į:
Metaphysically, we introspect a mind that unconsciously knows answers, a mind that consciously does not know, thus questions, and a mind (consciousness) which investigates, relating questions and answers, matching what we know and what we do not know, choosing to proceed consciously or unconsciously.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 14:12
atliko -
Pakeista 13 eilutė iš:
Active Inference (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) claims to reconcile conflicting theories of sentience: enactive, predictive and cybernetic. We argue that this conflict of perspectives, internal to human experience, yet transforming the cosmos, characterizes the humanlike condition. We distill this conflict metaphysically, recognize within evolution, trace throughout intellectual history, and model mathematically.
į:
Active Inference (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) claims to reconcile conflicting theories of sentience: enactive, predictive and cybernetic. We argue that this conflict of perspectives, internal to human experience, yet transforming the cosmos, characterizes the humanlike condition. We distill this conflict metaphysically, position within evolution, trace throughout intellectual history, and model mathematically.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 14:10
atliko -
Pakeista 21 eilutė iš:
The symmetries of mathematics itself, the classification of super division algebras, may well model a mind, its contextualization, its self-relation, and how these three act on an eight-cycle of mental states, manifesting Bott periodicity.
į:
The symmetries of mathematics itself, the classification of super division algebras, may well model a mind, its contextualization, its self-relation, and how these three act on an eight-cycle of mental states, "divisions of everything", manifesting Bott periodicity.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 14:10
atliko -
Pakeista 21 eilutė iš:
The symmetries of mathematics itself, the classification of super division algebras, can model a mind, its contextualization, its self-relation, and how these three act on an eight-cycle of mental states, manifesting Bott periodicity.
į:
The symmetries of mathematics itself, the classification of super division algebras, may well model a mind, its contextualization, its self-relation, and how these three act on an eight-cycle of mental states, manifesting Bott periodicity.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 14:08
atliko -
Pakeista 21 eilutė iš:
The symmetries of mathematics itself, the classification of super division algebras, can model a mind, its contextualization and its self-relation, and how these three act on an eight-cycle of mental states, manifesting Bott periodicity.
į:
The symmetries of mathematics itself, the classification of super division algebras, can model a mind, its contextualization, its self-relation, and how these three act on an eight-cycle of mental states, manifesting Bott periodicity.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 14:08
atliko -
Pakeista 21 eilutė iš:
The mathematics of the symmetries within mathematics, as in the classification of super division algebras, can model a mind, its contextualization and its self-relation, and how these three act on an eight-cycle of mental states, manifesting Bott periodicity.
į:
The symmetries of mathematics itself, the classification of super division algebras, can model a mind, its contextualization and its self-relation, and how these three act on an eight-cycle of mental states, manifesting Bott periodicity.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 14:06
atliko -
Pakeistos 13-19 eilutės iš
Metaphysically, we introspect a mind that unconsciously knows answers, a mind that consciously does not know, thus questions, and a mind (
In evolution, evidence for the embodied mind likewise supports the disembodying mind. An organism devotes resources to model what it knows but also what it does not know. Why do advanced brains have two hemispheres? They allow for dialogue between an advocate of a network of millons
Intellectual history is replete with the tension between yin and yang, intuition and rationality, fast-thinking System 1 and slow-thinking System 2. Various thinkers include the third faculty of self-knowing wisdom: Plato (epithumetikon
į:
Active Inference (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) claims to reconcile conflicting theories of sentience: enactive, predictive and cybernetic. We argue that this conflict of perspectives, internal to human experience, yet transforming the cosmos, characterizes the humanlike condition. We distill this conflict metaphysically, recognize within evolution, trace throughout intellectual history, and model mathematically.
Metaphysically, we introspect a mind that unconsciously knows answers, a mind that consciously does not know, thus questions, and a mind (consciousness) which investigates, relating questions and answers, matching what we know and what we do not know, choosing to act consciously or unconsciously.
In evolution, the embodied mind is likewise the disembodying mind. An organism devotes resources to model what it knows but also what it does not know. Why do advanced brains have two hemispheres? They allow for dialogue between an advocate of a network of millons of assertive neurons, enmeshed in the world, and an advocate of a language of thousands of inquiring concepts, divorced from the world. Bridging this gap are sparks of a fleeting yet self-establishing humanlike consciousness.
Intellectual history juxtaposes yin and yang, intuition and rationality, fast-thinking System 1 and slow-thinking System 2. Various thinkers include the third faculty of self-knowing wisdom: Plato (epithumetikon, thumetikon, logistikon), Aristotle (rhetoric, logic, dialectic), Confucius (duty, laws, virtue), Xun Kuang (wandering, focused, empty minds), St.Paul (carnal, soulish, spiritual people), Spinoza (experience, reason, intuition), Montesquieu (judicial, executive, legislative powers), Kant (judgment, practical reason, pure reason), Peirce (oneness, twoness, threeness), Arendt (labor, work, action). Beauty, goodness and truth entice these minds, respectively.
Metaphysically, we introspect a mind that unconsciously knows answers, a mind that consciously does not know, thus questions, and a mind (consciousness) which investigates, relating questions and answers, matching what we know and what we do not know, choosing to act consciously or unconsciously.
In evolution, the embodied mind is likewise the disembodying mind. An organism devotes resources to model what it knows but also what it does not know. Why do advanced brains have two hemispheres? They allow for dialogue between an advocate of a network of millons of assertive neurons, enmeshed in the world, and an advocate of a language of thousands of inquiring concepts, divorced from the world. Bridging this gap are sparks of a fleeting yet self-establishing humanlike consciousness.
Intellectual history juxtaposes yin and yang, intuition and rationality, fast-thinking System 1 and slow-thinking System 2. Various thinkers include the third faculty of self-knowing wisdom: Plato (epithumetikon, thumetikon, logistikon), Aristotle (rhetoric, logic, dialectic), Confucius (duty, laws, virtue), Xun Kuang (wandering, focused, empty minds), St.Paul (carnal, soulish, spiritual people), Spinoza (experience, reason, intuition), Montesquieu (judicial, executive, legislative powers), Kant (judgment, practical reason, pure reason), Peirce (oneness, twoness, threeness), Arendt (labor, work, action). Beauty, goodness and truth entice these minds, respectively.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 13:59
atliko -
Pakeistos 17-21 eilutės iš
In evolution, the evidence for the embodied mind is likewise evidence for the disembodying mind. An organism devotes resources to model what it knows but also what it does not know. This suggests why advanced brains have two hemispheres. There is a need for dialogue between an advocate of a network of millons of assertive neurons, enmeshed in the world, and an advocate of a language of thousands of inquiring concepts, divorced from the world. Bridging this gap are the sparks of a fleeting yet self-establishing humanlike consciousness.
Intellectual history is replete withpersonalities who distinguished the tension between yin and yang, intuition and rationality, fast-thinking System 1 and slow-thinking System 2 (in the words of Kahneman). Various thinkers include the third faculty of self-knowing wisdom: Plato (epithumetikon, thumetikon, logistikon), Aristotle (rhetoric, logic, dialectic), Konfucius (duty and shame, laws and punishments, virtue and propriety), Xun Kuang (wandering, focused, empty minds), St.Paul (carnal, soulish, spiritual people), Spinoza (experience, reason, intuition), Montesquieu (judicial, executive, legislative powers), Kant (judgment, practical reason, pure reason), Peirce (oneness, twoness, threeness), Arendt (labor, work, action). These three minds are drawn by beauty, goodness and truth, respectively.
The mathematics of the symmetries within mathematics, as in the classification of super division algebras, can model a mind, its contextualization and its self-relation, and how all three act on an eight-cycle of mental states, manifesting Bott periodicity.
Intellectual history is replete with
The mathematics of the symmetries within mathematics, as in the classification of super division algebras, can model a mind,
į:
In evolution, evidence for the embodied mind likewise supports the disembodying mind. An organism devotes resources to model what it knows but also what it does not know. Why do advanced brains have two hemispheres? They allow for dialogue between an advocate of a network of millons of assertive neurons, enmeshed in the world, and an advocate of a language of thousands of inquiring concepts, divorced from the world. Bridging this gap are sparks of a fleeting yet self-establishing humanlike consciousness.
Intellectual history is replete with the tension between yin and yang, intuition and rationality, fast-thinking System 1 and slow-thinking System 2. Various thinkers include the third faculty of self-knowing wisdom: Plato (epithumetikon, thumetikon, logistikon), Aristotle (rhetoric, logic, dialectic), Konfucius (duty and shame, laws and punishments, virtue and propriety), Xun Kuang (wandering, focused, empty minds), St.Paul (carnal, soulish, spiritual people), Spinoza (experience, reason, intuition), Montesquieu (judicial, executive, legislative powers), Kant (judgment, practical reason, pure reason), Peirce (oneness, twoness, threeness), Arendt (labor, work, action). These three minds are drawn by beauty, goodness and truth, respectively.
The mathematics of the symmetries within mathematics, as in the classification of super division algebras, can model a mind, its contextualization and its self-relation, and how these three act on an eight-cycle of mental states, manifesting Bott periodicity.
Intellectual history is replete with the tension between yin and yang, intuition and rationality, fast-thinking System 1 and slow-thinking System 2. Various thinkers include the third faculty of self-knowing wisdom: Plato (epithumetikon, thumetikon, logistikon), Aristotle (rhetoric, logic, dialectic), Konfucius (duty and shame, laws and punishments, virtue and propriety), Xun Kuang (wandering, focused, empty minds), St.Paul (carnal, soulish, spiritual people), Spinoza (experience, reason, intuition), Montesquieu (judicial, executive, legislative powers), Kant (judgment, practical reason, pure reason), Peirce (oneness, twoness, threeness), Arendt (labor, work, action). These three minds are drawn by beauty, goodness and truth, respectively.
The mathematics of the symmetries within mathematics, as in the classification of super division algebras, can model a mind, its contextualization and its self-relation, and how these three act on an eight-cycle of mental states, manifesting Bott periodicity.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 13:55
atliko -
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 13:55
atliko -
Pakeistos 13-15 eilutės iš
The Active Inference textbook (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) claims that this theoretical framework reconciles conflicting theories of sentience: enactive, predictive and cybernetic. We argue that this conflict of perspectives, internal to human experience, yet imposing itself upon the cosmos, characterizes the humanlike condition. We specify this conflict by distilling it metaphysically, identifying it in evolutionary biology, tracing it in intellectual history, and modeling it mathematically.
Metaphysically, we may introspect within ourselves a mind that unconsciously knows answers, a mind that consciously does not know, thus questions, and a mind (our full fledged consciousness) which investigates, willfully and deliberately, relating questions and answers, matching what we know and what we do not know, then choosing, willfully, deliberately, when to act consciously rather than unconsciously.
Metaphysically, we may introspect within ourselves a mind that unconsciously knows answers, a mind that consciously does not know, thus questions
į:
The Active Inference textbook (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) claims to reconcile conflicting theories of sentience: enactive, predictive and cybernetic. We argue that this conflict of perspectives, internal to human experience, yet transforming the cosmos, characterizes the humanlike condition. We distill this conflict metaphysically, identify within evolution, trace throughout intellectual history, and model mathematically.
Metaphysically, we introspect a mind that unconsciously knows answers, a mind that consciously does not know, thus questions, and a mind (our full fledged consciousness) which investigates, relating questions and answers, matching what we know and what we do not know, then choosing when to act consciously rather than unconsciously.
Metaphysically, we introspect a mind that unconsciously knows answers, a mind that consciously does not know, thus questions, and a mind (our full fledged consciousness) which investigates, relating questions and answers, matching what we know and what we do not know, then choosing when to act consciously rather than unconsciously.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 13:51
atliko -
Pakeista 21 eilutė iš:
į:
The mathematics of the symmetries within mathematics, as in the classification of super division algebras, can model a mind, its contextualization and its self-relation, and how all three act on an eight-cycle of mental states, manifesting Bott periodicity.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 13:46
atliko -
Pakeistos 19-23 eilutės iš
Intellectual history is replete with personalities who distinguished the tension between yin and yang, intuition and rationality, fast-thinking System 1 and slow-thinking System 2 (in the words of Kahneman).
Hannah
Hannah
į:
Intellectual history is replete with personalities who distinguished the tension between yin and yang, intuition and rationality, fast-thinking System 1 and slow-thinking System 2 (in the words of Kahneman). Various thinkers include the third faculty of self-knowing wisdom: Plato (epithumetikon, thumetikon, logistikon), Aristotle (rhetoric, logic, dialectic), Konfucius (duty and shame, laws and punishments, virtue and propriety), Xun Kuang (wandering, focused, empty minds), St.Paul (carnal, soulish, spiritual people), Spinoza (experience, reason, intuition), Montesquieu (judicial, executive, legislative powers), Kant (judgment, practical reason, pure reason), Peirce (oneness, twoness, threeness), Arendt (labor, work, action). These three minds are drawn by beauty, goodness and truth, respectively.
Abstrakčiausioje matematikoje, kur iškyla pačioje matematikos kalboje slypinčių simetrijų apibūdinimas, būtent supersimetrijų klasifikavime, atsiveria šių trijų protų modeliavimo galimybės.
Abstrakčiausioje matematikoje, kur iškyla pačioje matematikos kalboje slypinčių simetrijų apibūdinimas, būtent supersimetrijų klasifikavime, atsiveria šių trijų protų modeliavimo galimybės.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 13:40
atliko -
Pakeista 15 eilutė iš:
Metaphysically, we may introspect within ourselves a mind that unconsciously knows answers, a mind that consciously does not know, thus questions, and a mind (our full fledged consciousness) which investigates, willfully and deliberately, relating questions and answers, matching what we know and what we do not know, and choosing, willfully, deliberately, when to act consciously rather than unconsciously.
į:
Metaphysically, we may introspect within ourselves a mind that unconsciously knows answers, a mind that consciously does not know, thus questions, and a mind (our full fledged consciousness) which investigates, willfully and deliberately, relating questions and answers, matching what we know and what we do not know, then choosing, willfully, deliberately, when to act consciously rather than unconsciously.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 13:40
atliko -
Pakeista 13 eilutė iš:
The Active Inference textbook (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) claims that this theoretical framework reconciles conflicting theories of sentience: enactive, predictive and cybernetic. We argue that this conflict of perspectives, internal to human experience, yet imposing itself upon the cosmos, characterizes the humanlike condition. We specify it by distilling it metaphysically, identifying it in evolutionary biology, tracing it in intellectual history, and modeling it mathematically.
į:
The Active Inference textbook (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) claims that this theoretical framework reconciles conflicting theories of sentience: enactive, predictive and cybernetic. We argue that this conflict of perspectives, internal to human experience, yet imposing itself upon the cosmos, characterizes the humanlike condition. We specify this conflict by distilling it metaphysically, identifying it in evolutionary biology, tracing it in intellectual history, and modeling it mathematically.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 13:38
atliko -
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 13:38
atliko -
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 13:38
atliko -
Pakeista 19 eilutė iš:
Intellectual history is replete with personal
į:
Intellectual history is replete with personalities who distinguished the tension between yin and yang, intuition and rationality, fast-thinking System 1 and slow-thinking System 2 (in the words of Kahneman).
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 13:35
atliko -
Pakeista 13 eilutė iš:
The Active Inference textbook (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) claims that this theoretical framework reconciles conflicting theories of sentience: enactive, predictive and cybernetic. This conflict of perspectives, internal to human experience, yet imposing itself upon the cosmos, characterizes the humanlike condition. We specify it by distilling it metaphysically, identifying it in evolutionary biology, tracing it in intellectual history, and modeling it mathematically.
į:
The Active Inference textbook (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) claims that this theoretical framework reconciles conflicting theories of sentience: enactive, predictive and cybernetic. We argue that this conflict of perspectives, internal to human experience, yet imposing itself upon the cosmos, characterizes the humanlike condition. We specify it by distilling it metaphysically, identifying it in evolutionary biology, tracing it in intellectual history, and modeling it mathematically.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 13:34
atliko -
Pakeista 17 eilutė iš:
In evolution, the evidence for the embodied mind is likewise evidence for the disembodying mind. An organism devotes resources to model what it knows but also what it does not know. This suggests why advanced brains have two hemispheres. There is a need for dialogue between an advocate of a network of millons of assertive neurons and an advocate of a language of thousands of interrogative concepts. Bridging this gap are the sparks of a fleeting yet self-establishing humanlike consciousness.
į:
In evolution, the evidence for the embodied mind is likewise evidence for the disembodying mind. An organism devotes resources to model what it knows but also what it does not know. This suggests why advanced brains have two hemispheres. There is a need for dialogue between an advocate of a network of millons of assertive neurons, enmeshed in the world, and an advocate of a language of thousands of inquiring concepts, divorced from the world. Bridging this gap are the sparks of a fleeting yet self-establishing humanlike consciousness.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 13:33
atliko -
Pridėtos 16-19 eilutės:
In evolution, the evidence for the embodied mind is likewise evidence for the disembodying mind. An organism devotes resources to model what it knows but also what it does not know. This suggests why advanced brains have two hemispheres. There is a need for dialogue between an advocate of a network of millons of assertive neurons and an advocate of a language of thousands of interrogative concepts. Bridging this gap are the sparks of a fleeting yet self-establishing humanlike consciousness.
Intellectual history is replete with personal
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 13:25
atliko -
Pakeistos 15-16 eilutės iš
Metaphysically, we may introspect within ourselves a mind that unconsciously knows answers, a mind that consciously does not know, thus questions, and a mind (our full fledged consciousness) which investigates, willfully and deliberately, relating questions and answers, matching what we know and what we do not know, and choosing, willfully, deliberately, what to implement unconsciously and what consciously.
į:
Metaphysically, we may introspect within ourselves a mind that unconsciously knows answers, a mind that consciously does not know, thus questions, and a mind (our full fledged consciousness) which investigates, willfully and deliberately, relating questions and answers, matching what we know and what we do not know, and choosing, willfully, deliberately, when to act consciously rather than unconsciously.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 13:24
atliko -
Pakeista 15 eilutė iš:
Metaphysically, we may introspect within ourselves a mind that unconsciously knows answers, a mind that consciously does not know, thus questions, and a mind (our full fledged consciousness) which investigates, willfully and deliberately, relating questions and answers, matching what we know and what we do not know
į:
Metaphysically, we may introspect within ourselves a mind that unconsciously knows answers, a mind that consciously does not know, thus questions, and a mind (our full fledged consciousness) which investigates, willfully and deliberately, relating questions and answers, matching what we know and what we do not know, and choosing, willfully, deliberately, what to implement unconsciously and what consciously.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 13:22
atliko -
Pakeista 15 eilutė iš:
Metaphysically, we may introspective within ourselves a mind that unconsciously knows answers, a mind that consciously does not know, thus questions, and a mind (our full fledged consciousness) which investigates, willfully and deliberately, relating questions and answers, matching what we know and what we do not know
į:
Metaphysically, we may introspect within ourselves a mind that unconsciously knows answers, a mind that consciously does not know, thus questions, and a mind (our full fledged consciousness) which investigates, willfully and deliberately, relating questions and answers, matching what we know and what we do not know
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 13:21
atliko -
Pakeistos 11-13 eilutės iš
'''The Humanlike Condition - Enactive Answers, Performative Questions, Cybernetic Investigations'''
The Active Inference textbook (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) claims that this theoretical framework reconciles conflicting theories of sentience: enactive,performative and cybernetic. This conflict of perspectives, internal to human experience, yet imposing itself upon the cosmos, characterizes the humanlike condition. We specify it by distilling it metaphysically, identifying it in evolutionary biology, tracing it in intellectual history, and modeling it mathematically.
The Active Inference textbook (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) claims that this theoretical framework reconciles conflicting theories of sentience: enactive,
į:
'''The Humanlike Condition - Enactive Answers, Predictive Questions, Cybernetic Investigations'''
The Active Inference textbook (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) claims that this theoretical framework reconciles conflicting theories of sentience: enactive, predictive and cybernetic. This conflict of perspectives, internal to human experience, yet imposing itself upon the cosmos, characterizes the humanlike condition. We specify it by distilling it metaphysically, identifying it in evolutionary biology, tracing it in intellectual history, and modeling it mathematically.
The Active Inference textbook (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) claims that this theoretical framework reconciles conflicting theories of sentience: enactive, predictive and cybernetic. This conflict of perspectives, internal to human experience, yet imposing itself upon the cosmos, characterizes the humanlike condition. We specify it by distilling it metaphysically, identifying it in evolutionary biology, tracing it in intellectual history, and modeling it mathematically.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 13:21
atliko -
Pakeistos 11-12 eilutės iš
'''The Humanlike Condition - Enactive, Performative, Cybernetic'''
į:
'''The Humanlike Condition - Enactive Answers, Performative Questions, Cybernetic Investigations'''
Pakeista 15 eilutė iš:
į:
Metaphysically, we may introspective within ourselves a mind that unconsciously knows answers, a mind that consciously does not know, thus questions, and a mind (our full fledged consciousness) which investigates, willfully and deliberately, relating questions and answers, matching what we know and what we do not know
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 13:14
atliko -
Pakeistos 13-15 eilutės iš
The Active Inference textbook (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) claims that this theoretical framework reconciles conflicting theories of sentience: enactive, performative and cybernetic. This conflict, internal to human experience, yet imposing itself upon the cosmos, characterizes the humanlike condition. We specify it by distilling it metaphysically, identifying it in evolutionary biology, tracing it in intellectual history, and modeling it mathematically.
į:
The Active Inference textbook (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) claims that this theoretical framework reconciles conflicting theories of sentience: enactive, performative and cybernetic. This conflict of perspectives, internal to human experience, yet imposing itself upon the cosmos, characterizes the humanlike condition. We specify it by distilling it metaphysically, identifying it in evolutionary biology, tracing it in intellectual history, and modeling it mathematically.
Introspectively, we may distinguish within ourselves three minds.
Introspectively, we may distinguish within ourselves three minds.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 13:12
atliko -
Pakeistos 11-13 eilutės iš
'''The Humanlike Condition - Adaptive, Performative, Cybernetic'''
The Active Inference textbook (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) claims that this theoretical framework reconciles conflicting theories of sentience:adaptive, performative and cybernetic. This conflict, internal to human experience, yet imposing itself upon the cosmos, characterizes the humanlike condition. We specify it by distilling it metaphysically, identifying it in evolutionary biology, tracing it in intellectual history, and modeling it mathematically.
The Active Inference textbook (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) claims that this theoretical framework reconciles conflicting theories of sentience:
į:
'''The Humanlike Condition - Enactive, Performative, Cybernetic'''
The Active Inference textbook (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) claims that this theoretical framework reconciles conflicting theories of sentience: enactive, performative and cybernetic. This conflict, internal to human experience, yet imposing itself upon the cosmos, characterizes the humanlike condition. We specify it by distilling it metaphysically, identifying it in evolutionary biology, tracing it in intellectual history, and modeling it mathematically.
The Active Inference textbook (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) claims that this theoretical framework reconciles conflicting theories of sentience: enactive, performative and cybernetic. This conflict, internal to human experience, yet imposing itself upon the cosmos, characterizes the humanlike condition. We specify it by distilling it metaphysically, identifying it in evolutionary biology, tracing it in intellectual history, and modeling it mathematically.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 13:11
atliko -
Pakeista 13 eilutė iš:
The Active Inference textbook (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) notes that this theoretical framework reconciles conflicting theories of sentience: adaptive, performative and cybernetic. This conflict, internal to human experience, yet imposing itself upon the cosmos, characterizes the humanlike condition. We specify it by distilling it metaphysically, identifying it in evolutionary biology, tracing it in intellectual history, and modeling it mathematically.
į:
The Active Inference textbook (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) claims that this theoretical framework reconciles conflicting theories of sentience: adaptive, performative and cybernetic. This conflict, internal to human experience, yet imposing itself upon the cosmos, characterizes the humanlike condition. We specify it by distilling it metaphysically, identifying it in evolutionary biology, tracing it in intellectual history, and modeling it mathematically.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 13:10
atliko -
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 13:10
atliko -
Pakeista 13 eilutė iš:
The Active Inference textbook (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) notes that this theoretical framework reconciles conflicting theories of sentience: adaptive, performative and cybernetic. This conflict, internal to human experience, yet imposing itself upon the cosmos, characterizes the humanlike condition. We specify it by distilling it metaphysically, placing it in evolution, tracing it in intellectual history, and modeling it mathematically.
į:
The Active Inference textbook (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) notes that this theoretical framework reconciles conflicting theories of sentience: adaptive, performative and cybernetic. This conflict, internal to human experience, yet imposing itself upon the cosmos, characterizes the humanlike condition. We specify it by distilling it metaphysically, identifying it in evolutionary biology, tracing it in intellectual history, and modeling it mathematically.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 13:08
atliko -
Pakeistos 13-15 eilutės iš
The Active Inference textbook (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) notes that this theoretical framework reconciles conflicting theories: adaptive, performative and cybernetic.
Anthropocene
Anthropocene
į:
The Active Inference textbook (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) notes that this theoretical framework reconciles conflicting theories of sentience: adaptive, performative and cybernetic. This conflict, internal to human experience, yet imposing itself upon the cosmos, characterizes the humanlike condition. We specify it by distilling it metaphysically, placing it in evolution, tracing it in intellectual history, and modeling it mathematically.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 12:00
atliko -
Pakeista 13 eilutė iš:
The Active Inference textbook ( 2022) notes that this theoretical framework unites and extends conflicting theories: adaptive, performative and cybernetic.
į:
The Active Inference textbook (Parr, Pezzulo, Friston, 2022) notes that this theoretical framework reconciles conflicting theories: adaptive, performative and cybernetic.
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 11:29
atliko -
Pakeista 11 eilutė iš:
'''The Human Condition - Adaptive, Performative, Cybernetic'''
į:
'''The Humanlike Condition - Adaptive, Performative, Cybernetic'''
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 09:22
atliko -
Pridėtos 13-14 eilutės:
The Active Inference textbook ( 2022) notes that this theoretical framework unites and extends conflicting theories: adaptive, performative and cybernetic.
Pakeistos 17-19 eilutės iš
į:
Hannah Arendt
2024 rugsėjo 10 d., 09:13
atliko -
Pridėtos 8-17 eilutės:
--------------------
'''The Human Condition - Adaptive, Performative, Cybernetic'''
Anthropocene
The Active Inference textbook ( 2022) notes that this theoretical framework unites and extends conflicting theories: adaptive, performative and cybernetic.
-------------------
2024 rugsėjo 08 d., 11:12
atliko -
Pakeista 12 eilutė iš:
Žmogaus vidiniai prieštaravimai leidžia įžvelgti ir išskirti jojo pasąmonę, sąmonę ir jas derinančią savimonę. Šį trijų protų išsiskyrimą galima paaiškinti metafiziškai, taip pat gamtos raidos dėsniais. Jisai vis naujai iškyla kultūros istorijoje ir yra išsakomas aukštąja matematika. Trimis protais suprantame įtampą tarp gamtos (pasąmonės) ir kultūros (sąmonės) ir jų derinančios savimonės.
į:
Žmogaus vidiniai prieštaravimai leidžia įžvelgti ir išskirti jojo pasąmonę, sąmonę ir jas derinančią savimonę. Šį trijų protų išsiskyrimą galima paaiškinti metafiziškai, taip pat gamtos raidos dėsniais. Išsiskyrimas vis naujai iškyla kultūros istorijoje ir yra išsakomas aukštąja matematika. Trimis protais suprantame įtampą tarp gamtos (pasąmonės) ir kultūros (sąmonės) ir jų derinančios savimonės.
2024 rugsėjo 08 d., 11:06
atliko -
Pakeista 12 eilutė iš:
Žmogaus vidiniai prieštaravimai leidžia įžvelgti ir išskirti jojo pasąmonę, sąmonę ir jas derinančią savimonę. Šį trijų protų išsiskyrimą galima paaiškinti metafiziškai, taip pat gamtos raidos dėsniais. Jisai vis naujai iškyla kultūros istorijoje ir yra išsakomas aukštąja matematika.
į:
Žmogaus vidiniai prieštaravimai leidžia įžvelgti ir išskirti jojo pasąmonę, sąmonę ir jas derinančią savimonę. Šį trijų protų išsiskyrimą galima paaiškinti metafiziškai, taip pat gamtos raidos dėsniais. Jisai vis naujai iškyla kultūros istorijoje ir yra išsakomas aukštąja matematika. Trimis protais suprantame įtampą tarp gamtos (pasąmonės) ir kultūros (sąmonės) ir jų derinančios savimonės.
2024 rugsėjo 08 d., 11:01
atliko -
Pakeista 20 eilutė iš:
Abstrakčiausioje matematikoje, kur iškyla pačioje matematikos kalboje slypinčių simetrijų apibūdinimas, būtent supersimetrijų klasifikavime.
į:
Abstrakčiausioje matematikoje, kur iškyla pačioje matematikos kalboje slypinčių simetrijų apibūdinimas, būtent supersimetrijų klasifikavime, atsiveria šių trijų protų modeliavimo galimybės.
2024 rugsėjo 08 d., 10:57
atliko -
Pakeistos 16-17 eilutės iš
Gamtos raidoje organizmai skiria dalį išteklių modeliuoti pažįstamus reiškinius ir dalį išteklių modeliuoti nepažįstamus reiškinius. Tad galima suprasti kodėl smegenyse iškyla du pusrutuliai, ne tik stuburiniuose gyvūnuose, bet taip pat protingumu pasižyminčiuose aštuonkojuose. Šiose sąlygose iškyla sąmoningumo galimybė.
į:
Gamtos raidoje organizmai skiria dalį išteklių modeliuoti pažįstamus reiškinius ir dalį išteklių modeliuoti nepažįstamus reiškinius. Tad galima suprasti kodėl smegenyse iškyla du pusrutuliai, ne tik stuburiniuose gyvūnuose, bet taip pat protingumu pasižyminčiuose aštuonkojuose. Vienas pusrutulis tarsi atstovauja milijonus neuronų, kuriais esame įaugę į pasaulį, iš kurio ištraukiamas reikalingas atsakymas. Kitas pusrutulis tarsi atstovauja tūkstančių sąvokų kalbą, kuria atsiplėšus nuo pasaulio bandoma jį perprasti įvairiausiais klausimais. Šiose dviejų protų ir tarp jų esančios prarajos sąlygose iškyla trečiojo proto, sąmoningumo, galimybė.
Pakeistos 20-38 eilutės iš
* Žmoguje išskiriu atsakantį protą, klausiantį protą ir tiriantį protą
* Šių trijų skirtingų protų tikslas yra pristatyti dvejopai, lygiaverčiai ką žinome ir ko nežinome, šiais dviem kampais užtikrintai išsakyti tą patį dalyką.
* Pasąmonė (atsakantis protas) žino, tačiau negali paaiškinti kaip. Sąmonė nežino, užtat klausia ir išsiaiškina kaip. Savimonė suderina klausimą ir atsakymą, taip pat sprendžia, kuriuo protu geriau vadovautis.
* Įvairiai iškyla:
** Prisideda vienas, du, trys požiūriai.
* Pasąmone esame gamtos dalis, sąmone dalyvaujame kultūroje, tarp jų yra praraja.
* sąmonė - nuovokumas
* savimonė - sąmoningumas
į:
Abstrakčiausioje matematikoje, kur iškyla pačioje matematikos kalboje slypinčių simetrijų apibūdinimas, būtent supersimetrijų klasifikavime.
2024 rugsėjo 08 d., 10:44
atliko -
Pakeistos 10-13 eilutės iš
'''Pasąmonės, sąmonės, savimonės šaknys metafizikoje, ištakos gamtos raidoje, apraiškos kultūros istorijoje, išraiškos matematikoje.'''
Žmogaus vidiniai prieštaravimai leidžia įžvelgti ir išskirtijo pasąmonę, sąmonę ir jas derinančią savimonę. Šis trijų protų išsiskyrimas paaiškinamas metafiziškai, taip pat gamtos raidos dėsniais. Jisai vis naujai iškyla kultūros istorijoje ir yra išsakomas aukštąja matematika.
Žmogaus vidiniai prieštaravimai leidžia įžvelgti ir išskirti
į:
'''Pasąmonės, sąmonės, savimonės šaknys metafizikoje, ištakos gamtos raidoje, apraiškos kultūros istorijoje, išraiška matematikoje.'''
Žmogaus vidiniai prieštaravimai leidžia įžvelgti ir išskirti jojo pasąmonę, sąmonę ir jas derinančią savimonę. Šį trijų protų išsiskyrimą galima paaiškinti metafiziškai, taip pat gamtos raidos dėsniais. Jisai vis naujai iškyla kultūros istorijoje ir yra išsakomas aukštąja matematika.
Metafiziškai aiškinant, sąmoningam žinojimui svarbu remtis žinojimu, taip pat pasikliauti nežinojimu. Taip priešingai žiūrint, savaime išryškėja skirtumas tarp atsakymus žinančius pasąmonės ir nieko nežinančios, tad klausimus klausiančios sąmonės. Jas sulygina tiriančioji savimonė, užtikrinanti jųjų sutarimą, atsakymų ir klausimų atitikimą. Savimonė taip pat dalykiškai sprendžia, kuriais atvejais vadovautis pasąmone, ir kuriais sąmone.
Gamtos raidoje organizmai skiria dalį išteklių modeliuoti pažįstamus reiškinius ir dalį išteklių modeliuoti nepažįstamus reiškinius. Tad galima suprasti kodėl smegenyse iškyla du pusrutuliai, ne tik stuburiniuose gyvūnuose, bet taip pat protingumu pasižyminčiuose aštuonkojuose. Šiose sąlygose iškyla sąmoningumo galimybė.
Kultūros istorijoje įvairiausiai aptariamas skirtumas ir dialogas tarp intuityvaus mąstymo ir racionalaus mąstymo, pradedant jin ir jang, ir nusitęsiant iki psichologų Kahneman ir Tversky sistemos 1 ir 2. Įvairūs mąstytojai pripažįsta trečiąjį mąstymą - išmintingąją savimonę - kuria žmogus valdo save: Platonas (epithumetikon, thumetikon, logistikon), Aristotelis (retorika, logika, dialektika), Konfucijus (pareiga ir gėda, įsakymai ir bausmės, dorybė ir deramumas), Xun Kuang (klajojantis, sutelktas, tuščias protas), šv.Paulius (kūniški, protiški, dvasiški žmonės), Spinoza (patirtys, protas, nuovoka), Montesquieu (teisiamoji, vykdomoji, leidžiamoji valdžia), Kantas (sprendimo galia, praktinis protas, grynasis protas), Peirce (vienumas, dvejumas, trejumas) ir taip toliau. Šiuos tris protus atitinkamai traukia grožis, gėris ir jų darnos ieškanti tiesa.
Abstrakčiojoje matematikoje, kur
Žmogaus vidiniai prieštaravimai leidžia įžvelgti ir išskirti jojo pasąmonę, sąmonę ir jas derinančią savimonę. Šį trijų protų išsiskyrimą galima paaiškinti metafiziškai, taip pat gamtos raidos dėsniais. Jisai vis naujai iškyla kultūros istorijoje ir yra išsakomas aukštąja matematika.
Metafiziškai aiškinant, sąmoningam žinojimui svarbu remtis žinojimu, taip pat pasikliauti nežinojimu. Taip priešingai žiūrint, savaime išryškėja skirtumas tarp atsakymus žinančius pasąmonės ir nieko nežinančios, tad klausimus klausiančios sąmonės. Jas sulygina tiriančioji savimonė, užtikrinanti jųjų sutarimą, atsakymų ir klausimų atitikimą. Savimonė taip pat dalykiškai sprendžia, kuriais atvejais vadovautis pasąmone, ir kuriais sąmone.
Gamtos raidoje organizmai skiria dalį išteklių modeliuoti pažįstamus reiškinius ir dalį išteklių modeliuoti nepažįstamus reiškinius. Tad galima suprasti kodėl smegenyse iškyla du pusrutuliai, ne tik stuburiniuose gyvūnuose, bet taip pat protingumu pasižyminčiuose aštuonkojuose. Šiose sąlygose iškyla sąmoningumo galimybė.
Kultūros istorijoje įvairiausiai aptariamas skirtumas ir dialogas tarp intuityvaus mąstymo ir racionalaus mąstymo, pradedant jin ir jang, ir nusitęsiant iki psichologų Kahneman ir Tversky sistemos 1 ir 2. Įvairūs mąstytojai pripažįsta trečiąjį mąstymą - išmintingąją savimonę - kuria žmogus valdo save: Platonas (epithumetikon, thumetikon, logistikon), Aristotelis (retorika, logika, dialektika), Konfucijus (pareiga ir gėda, įsakymai ir bausmės, dorybė ir deramumas), Xun Kuang (klajojantis, sutelktas, tuščias protas), šv.Paulius (kūniški, protiški, dvasiški žmonės), Spinoza (patirtys, protas, nuovoka), Montesquieu (teisiamoji, vykdomoji, leidžiamoji valdžia), Kantas (sprendimo galia, praktinis protas, grynasis protas), Peirce (vienumas, dvejumas, trejumas) ir taip toliau. Šiuos tris protus atitinkamai traukia grožis, gėris ir jų darnos ieškanti tiesa.
Abstrakčiojoje matematikoje, kur
2024 rugsėjo 08 d., 09:58
atliko -
Pridėtos 11-13 eilutės:
Žmogaus vidiniai prieštaravimai leidžia įžvelgti ir išskirti jo pasąmonę, sąmonę ir jas derinančią savimonę. Šis trijų protų išsiskyrimas paaiškinamas metafiziškai, taip pat gamtos raidos dėsniais. Jisai vis naujai iškyla kultūros istorijoje ir yra išsakomas aukštąja matematika.
2024 rugsėjo 08 d., 09:18
atliko -
Pakeista 10 eilutė iš:
'''Pasąmonės, sąmonės, savimonės šaknys metafizikoje, gamtos raidoje, kultūros istorijoje, matematikoje.'''
į:
'''Pasąmonės, sąmonės, savimonės šaknys metafizikoje, ištakos gamtos raidoje, apraiškos kultūros istorijoje, išraiškos matematikoje.'''
2024 rugsėjo 08 d., 09:07
atliko -
Pakeista 10 eilutė iš:
'''Pasąmonė, sąmonė, savimonė. Trijų protų apraiškos kultūros istorijoje.'''
į:
'''Pasąmonės, sąmonės, savimonės šaknys metafizikoje, gamtos raidoje, kultūros istorijoje, matematikoje.'''
2024 rugsėjo 06 d., 10:09
atliko -
Pridėtos 15-17 eilutės:
* Įvairiai iškyla:
** Prisideda vienas, du, trys požiūriai.
** Prisideda vienas, du, trys požiūriai.
2024 rugsėjo 06 d., 09:05
atliko -
Pridėta 15 eilutė:
* Pasąmone esame gamtos dalis, sąmone dalyvaujame kultūroje, tarp jų yra praraja.
2024 rugsėjo 06 d., 09:04
atliko -
Pridėtos 11-18 eilutės:
* Žmoguje išskiriu atsakantį protą, klausiantį protą ir tiriantį protą.
* Šių trijų skirtingų protų tikslas yra pristatyti dvejopai, lygiaverčiai ką žinome ir ko nežinome, šiais dviem kampais užtikrintai išsakyti tą patį dalyką.
* Pasąmonė (atsakantis protas) žino, tačiau negali paaiškinti kaip. Sąmonė nežino, užtat klausia ir išsiaiškina kaip. Savimonė suderina klausimą ir atsakymą, taip pat sprendžia, kuriuo protu geriau vadovautis.
2024 rugsėjo 06 d., 08:59
atliko -
Pridėtos 11-13 eilutės:
* sąmonė - nuovokumas
* savimonė - sąmoningumas
2024 rugsėjo 06 d., 08:56
atliko -
Pridėtos 8-10 eilutės:
'''Pasąmonė, sąmonė, savimonė. Trijų protų apraiškos kultūros istorijoje.'''
2024 rugsėjo 06 d., 08:51
atliko -
Pridėtos 1-10 eilutės:
[[Trys protai]]
[+Paraiškos apie tris protus+]
* [[https://www.lkti.lt/2024-m-rugsejo-26-d/ | Antropoceno iššūkiai kultūroje, menuose ir (geo)politikoje]]
* [[https://www.lkti.lt/uploads/Konferencijos/2024/2024.11.07-08/2024.11.07-08.cfp.NEW.pdf | Human Condition in the Anthropocence]] Siūlyti iki rugsėjo 10 d.
* Applied Active Inference. Siūlyti rugsėjo mėnesį.
[+Paraiškos apie tris protus+]
* [[https://www.lkti.lt/2024-m-rugsejo-26-d/ | Antropoceno iššūkiai kultūroje, menuose ir (geo)politikoje]]
* [[https://www.lkti.lt/uploads/Konferencijos/2024/2024.11.07-08/2024.11.07-08.cfp.NEW.pdf | Human Condition in the Anthropocence]] Siūlyti iki rugsėjo 10 d.
* Applied Active Inference. Siūlyti rugsėjo mėnesį.
ParaiškosApieTrisProtus
Naujausi pakeitimai
网站
Įvadas #E9F5FC
Klausimai #FFFFC0
Teiginiai #FFFFFF
Kitų mintys #EFCFE1
Dievas man #FFECC0
Iš ankščiau #CCFFCC
Mieli skaitytojai, visa mano kūryba ir kartu visi šie puslapiai yra visuomenės turtas, kuriuo visi kviečiami laisvai naudotis, dalintis, visaip perkurti. - Andrius