Mintys.ValiosIšraiškos istorijaRodyti nežymius pakeitimus - Rodyti kodo pakeitimus 2024 vasario 20 d., 15:13
atliko -
Pridėtos 18-19 eilutės:
Pakeistos 22-23 eilutės iš
į:
Pakeistos 44-45 eilutės iš
Tai atjautose iškylantis septintasis požiūris kuomet vieno lygmens troškimas atjaučia kito lygmens netroškimą. Kitaip tarus, vieno lygmens nulinis požiūris atjaučia kito lygmens septintąjį požiūrį. Tuo pačiu nuliniam požiūriui tenka atjausti ir visus kitus to lygmens požiūrius. į:
Tai atjautose iškylantis septintasis požiūris kuomet vieno lygmens troškimas atjaučia kito lygmens netroškimą. Kitaip tarus, vieno lygmens nulinis požiūris atjaučia kito lygmens septintąjį požiūrį. Tuo pačiu nuliniam požiūriui tenka atjausti ir visus kitus to lygmens požiūrius. Septintasis požiūris yra vartai į visus kitus santvarkos požiūrius. Nuodėmės verčia reikšti valią Pakeistos 49-62 eilutės iš
Nuodėmės verčia reikšti valią
We're commanded not to do such things. It suggests an interesting idea: suffering, etc. may all be good, as an expression of the will. But we should not force people to express their will! In the system that I'm working out, these ways of expressing the will should play a central role. I was writing up how all of these structures unfolded, but then I noticed that I was making use of one of the very structures that I was going to describe, which I call "the divisions of everything". That's not so bad, but it made me wonder, is this a special property of this particular structure, its role in defining things, and what do all the other structures offer? į:
Mes įsakyti viso to nedaryti. Kentėti ir taip toliau savaime gali būti gera, gali būti valios raiška, bet nedera kitus versti reikšti savo valią. 2024 vasario 20 d., 15:07
atliko -
Pakeistos 13-17 eilutės iš
Valios išraiškos į:
Valia
Kitos sandaros Pakeistos 20-21 eilutės iš
į:
2024 vasario 20 d., 15:04
atliko -
Pakeistos 3-4 eilutės iš
į:
Pakeistos 24-25 eilutės iš
Šešios valios išraiškos yra: į:
Šešios valios išraiškos yra septintasis požiūris iškylantis netroškimų atmainose, Dievo troškimui atjaučiant žmogaus netroškimą. Septintuoju požiūriu žmogus kitu išgyvena šią Dievo atjautą. Pridėta 32 eilutė:
Anglų kalba: 2021 gegužės 27 d., 14:43
atliko -
Ištrintos 43-46 eilutės:
Aš renkuosi vietoj kad mums derėtų I want to apply knowledge to remake our world, and engage it rather than just rise above it. I look for inspiration to Christ's Sermon on the Mount where I think he distinguishes between the logic of "I choose" and "we should". Ištrintos 56-88 eilutės:
Kokia prasmė viso šio žinojimo? Keturi netroškimai yra savaime vertingi, mums leidžia:
I value such knowledge. I find it useful. But it is knowledge that elevates our thinking so that we can live above this world. So it doesn't really connect much with any attachment we have to this world. It frees the spirit, but not the soul. I think the point of life is to do things in this world, to inject our spirit here and remake this world we have entered into. It's very good that we can rise above this world, but the point is to engage it. So I thought about Christ, who I choose to follow. What attracts me most about Christ is that he says how to directly take on the issues of this world. "Love God", "Love your neighbor as yourself", and in his Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5) he punches out a platform of very practical ways to engage this life. I don't see much conscious effort by people to apply this, but we could do it. This is a kind of knowledge that I think is useful in this world, and engages it, and remakes it. Šešios Jėzaus antitezės Jesus makes six statements that are known as "antitheses" because he says, "You have heard it said... but I tell you..." For example, you have heard "an eye for an eye" but Jesus says "turn the other cheek". A couple of years ago, I tried to figure out his logic for these statements. In this one, I think he's saying that rather than account (an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth), we should satisfy (turning the cheek, walking the extra mile, giving away our coat). I went back over these logics, and I think they relate to the ways we express our will. In the case above, relying on others is a way of expressing our will, and there is something holy about that. Yet stealing is wrong to the extent that it forces us to rely on others. There is also something useless about prescribing that we rely on others, something futile about insisting that we should. That is what accounting is all about: you should rely on others as to what belongs to you, and what does not. Instead, he seems to say, why don't just satisfy them? Just give everything away, and choose to rely on others. In each case, I think it says that instead of prescribing us to express our will, we should rather simply choose to express our will. For example, we can express our will by believing. Lying forces people to believe. Convincing tells them they should believe. Instead, why not just choose to believe: take a stand. This is important to me here because it suggests ways that knowledge can be used practically to remake this world.
I wrote about my interest to integrate raw initiative and to create a system to fit together our work so that we could support and encourage each other effortlessly. I want such a system to be based on our choice to express our own will, rather than what we think people should do. I find it very hard to eliminate "should" from my thinking! 2021 gegužės 27 d., 14:38
atliko -
Pakeistos 42-93 eilutės iš
Šešios valios išraiškos grindžia šešis neigiamus Dievo įsakymus mylėti artimą, nekenkti jam, neversti jo pareikšti savo valią. Valia turėtų būti laisva ir savanoriška. į:
Šešios valios išraiškos grindžia šešis neigiamus Dievo įsakymus mylėti artimą, nekenkti jam, neversti jo pareikšti savo valią. Valia turėtų būti laisva ir savanoriška. Aš renkuosi vietoj kad mums derėtų I want to apply knowledge to remake our world, and engage it rather than just rise above it. I look for inspiration to Christ's Sermon on the Mount where I think he distinguishes between the logic of "I choose" and "we should". Nuodėmės verčia reikšti valią
We're commanded not to do such things. It suggests an interesting idea: suffering, etc. may all be good, as an expression of the will. But we should not force people to express their will! In the system that I'm working out, these ways of expressing the will should play a central role. I was writing up how all of these structures unfolded, but then I noticed that I was making use of one of the very structures that I was going to describe, which I call "the divisions of everything". That's not so bad, but it made me wonder, is this a special property of this particular structure, its role in defining things, and what do all the other structures offer? Kokia prasmė viso šio žinojimo? Keturi netroškimai yra savaime vertingi, mums leidžia:
I value such knowledge. I find it useful. But it is knowledge that elevates our thinking so that we can live above this world. So it doesn't really connect much with any attachment we have to this world. It frees the spirit, but not the soul. I think the point of life is to do things in this world, to inject our spirit here and remake this world we have entered into. It's very good that we can rise above this world, but the point is to engage it. So I thought about Christ, who I choose to follow. What attracts me most about Christ is that he says how to directly take on the issues of this world. "Love God", "Love your neighbor as yourself", and in his Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5) he punches out a platform of very practical ways to engage this life. I don't see much conscious effort by people to apply this, but we could do it. This is a kind of knowledge that I think is useful in this world, and engages it, and remakes it. Šešios Jėzaus antitezės Jesus makes six statements that are known as "antitheses" because he says, "You have heard it said... but I tell you..." For example, you have heard "an eye for an eye" but Jesus says "turn the other cheek". A couple of years ago, I tried to figure out his logic for these statements. In this one, I think he's saying that rather than account (an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth), we should satisfy (turning the cheek, walking the extra mile, giving away our coat). I went back over these logics, and I think they relate to the ways we express our will. In the case above, relying on others is a way of expressing our will, and there is something holy about that. Yet stealing is wrong to the extent that it forces us to rely on others. There is also something useless about prescribing that we rely on others, something futile about insisting that we should. That is what accounting is all about: you should rely on others as to what belongs to you, and what does not. Instead, he seems to say, why don't just satisfy them? Just give everything away, and choose to rely on others. In each case, I think it says that instead of prescribing us to express our will, we should rather simply choose to express our will. For example, we can express our will by believing. Lying forces people to believe. Convincing tells them they should believe. Instead, why not just choose to believe: take a stand. This is important to me here because it suggests ways that knowledge can be used practically to remake this world.
I wrote about my interest to integrate raw initiative and to create a system to fit together our work so that we could support and encourage each other effortlessly. I want such a system to be based on our choice to express our own will, rather than what we think people should do. I find it very hard to eliminate "should" from my thinking! 2021 gegužės 27 d., 14:36
atliko -
Pridėtos 1-42 eilutės:
意志表达 Valios išraiškos
Valios išraiškos Šešios valios išraiškos yra:
Tai atjautose iškylantis septintasis požiūris kuomet vieno lygmens troškimas atjaučia kito lygmens netroškimą. Kitaip tarus, vieno lygmens nulinis požiūris atjaučia kito lygmens septintąjį požiūrį. Tuo pačiu nuliniam požiūriui tenka atjausti ir visus kitus to lygmens požiūrius. Šešios valios išraiškos grindžia šešis neigiamus Dievo įsakymus mylėti artimą, nekenkti jam, neversti jo pareikšti savo valią. Valia turėtų būti laisva ir savanoriška. |
ValiosIšraiškosNaujausi pakeitimai 网站 Įvadas #E9F5FC Klausimai #FFFFC0 Teiginiai #FFFFFF Kitų mintys #EFCFE1 Dievas man #FFECC0 Iš ankščiau #CCFFCC Mieli skaitytojai, visa mano kūryba ir kartu visi šie puslapiai yra visuomenės turtas, kuriuo visi kviečiami laisvai naudotis, dalintis, visaip perkurti. - Andrius |
Puslapis paskutinį kartą pakeistas 2024 vasario 20 d., 15:13
|